Feb
23
2010
I’ve decided that, since it’s so hard to find time to make posts for a single blog, let alone many, I’m just going to cross-post everything from Agnosiophobia. You’ll notice a whole bunch of new posts here going back weeks, if not months. I just copied all of the posts from Agnosiophobia.
Enjoy!
Jan
09
2010
So I’m lying in bed Saturday night watching cartoons. I hadn’t showered since Friday morning, but since I was at home and didn’t plan on going anywhere, I didn’t give it much thought. The wife meanwhile was laying beside me in bed with a computer in her lap, playing on Facebook as usual.
For no real reason I began to feel a bit randy (maybe it was the sexy pirate pictures of herself that she was posting). I was just about to turn to my wife and ask if she wanted to have sex when she says “Whew! Man, your balls kinda stink.”
Being the quick thinking, smooth talking ladies man that I am, I didn’t even miss a beat.
“Wanna mix your stank with mine?”
Between the laughter and the gagging, I eventually figured out that the answer was no.
Dec
22
2009
I’ve started my third (and hopefully final) blog over at Agnosiophobia. The plan is to have this blog (Venture Free) focus more on sciencey stuff, When A Leaf Turns should focus more on philosophical stuff, and Agnosiophobia will focus more on religous stuff.
Of course, considering how rarely I post here and at When A Leaf Turns, having a third blog will probably just cut that amount even more. The hope is that there will be some overlap so that a single post can go on two or possibly all three blogs. We’ll see.
Dec
09
2009

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1234430/Mystery-spiral-blue-light-display-hovers-Norway.html
Having just seen this for the first time, and without having to investigate any further I can say without reservation that this is absolute proof that aliens are among us. Now that we have this proof, it is up to you to prove everything that has ever been claimed about UFO’s is absolutely false before you can claim otherwise. That’s how real scientists work. Umm…isn’t it?
Nov
19
2009
Last year, during the Christmas season the company that I work for thought it would be nice to put up a whole bunch of decorations. Nothing out of the ordinary really. Just some festive, christmasy doohickeys like mini-christmas trees and over-sized tree ornaments hanging from the ceiling.
Unfortunately for me, this is the one that was hung just above and in front of my desk:

You don’t really get a sense of scale with this picture, but it was like a foot and a half across and staring down at me for like a month! Sure it’s smiling, but after awhile even a smile begins to look sinister. And are those tears running down the sides of it’s face? What the hell is wrong with that thing?
(In truth I loved it because it bothered everyone else so much)
Oct
18
2009
I’m out of town on family business, so I haven’t had much of a chance to post anything lately. Here’s a few things that have interested me in the last week. I’m not gonna elaborate much, but here they are:
- Obama Team Continues Effort to Isolate Fox News – Of course Obama isn’t saying anything that isn’t known by pretty much everyone anyway. However, I’m not sure if this is the way to handle it. First pass impression is that this will backfire. However, what are the alternatives? Simply ignore it? Maybe. I don’t know. I’ll give it some thought and get back to you.
- Intelligent Alien Intervention Institute – A very good spoof on ID and their quest to work their way into the US schools.
- Futurity – I heard about this site from an NPR story. I’m not sure exactly what to make of it yet. So far it seems great. However, since the stories are direct from the sources, rather than being vetted by a professional Science journalist (a dying breed), they may not be as accurate as one would like. I’m keeping an eye on this one, and I may be making posts about stories found here soon.
- New view reveals how DNA fits into cell – I want to make a post about fractals soon, and I think this might be a good jumping off point.
That’s all I really have time for at the moment. I’ll try and get back to this as soon as I am able.
Oct
13
2009
I don’t know a whole lot about the Nobel Prize and how it’s awarded. I do know a little bit from the bits and pieces that I’ve picked up in the many years of reading popular science books which often discuss Nobel Prize Laureates and sometimes discuss the award itself. For instance, I know that the Nobel Prize for the sciences are generally given many many years after the initial discovery is made. This is so the actual impact of the discovery can be gauged before the award is given. There may be a discovery this year that seems truly groundbreaking and exciting, and ten years from now it may turn out that it was a flash in the pan discovery that really didn’t go anywhere. The delay is meant to weed out those kinds of discoveries and leave only those that have a real impact on the scientific world.
Since I learned this about the Nobel Prize I’ve wondered why they don’t do the same thing with the Peace Prize. Award the prize only after several decades have passed so that it’s limited to those who have had an actual real impact on the world. The fact that President Obama won it this year shows pretty clearly that this is not how it’s done. I think even the staunchest Obama supporter understands that he hasn’t done much to earn that prize yet (whether they admit that aloud or not is another question altogether).
Two possibilities really jump out at me on exactly what has happened here (not this year specifically, but to the Peace Prize in general). First, it’s possible that the original award was not meant to reward those who have made a difference, but to try and make a difference itself. In other words, it was always meant as a political gesture. The second possibility is that the award process was corrupted by those who recognized it’s potential political use. This process would be a little slower, but only because it would start later, after the prize had time to gain some real credibility. In either case it would quickly lead to the exact situation that we see today: Peace Prize as an empty, meaningless political gesture.
In conclusion, let it be understood that I am speaking from a position of ignorance here. I don’t know much about the Peace Prize, and I’ve done almost nothing to remedy that. Perhaps someone could convince me that it’s worth digger deeper into. Otherwise I’ll just continue doing sciency stuff and making fun of religion and homeopaths.